I pretty much get all news from wsj and npr now. Feel they get as close to coubterbalancing and reporting as it gets.
They advocated blowing up Mount Rushmore before realizing how ****ing dumb it sounded and deleted the tweet. Yeah, I'd say they are pretty liberal. I do enjoy the HBO series however. And I enjoy when Shane Smith does the Joe Rogan Experience podcast.
They actually just changed the tweet from let's "blow up Mt Rushmore" to let's "get rid of Mt Rushmore."
Even idiots are fans of logic and reasoning. A more appropriate quip would've been, "Nothing wrong with Tucker unless you aren't a fan of poor logic and reason."
Tucker Carlson isn't news. He's a slightly less abrasive and slight more intelligent version of Hannity.
He usually talks about current events and does a good job of bringing people on his show and challenging them. I like it. Imo
I don't want to come of as condescending, but I can't just follow one talking head or I run the risk of ending up in my echo chamber. That said, you said he's all you watch, which is different from "it's all the news I get." I imagine you probably don't watch Tucker and then get all the rest of your national news from Breitbart and The Blaze.
BBC, Economist, Atlantic, some National Review, WSJ, NPR, WaPo, NYT. I watch Chuck and Chris Wallace on Sundays, and yeah I watch CNN all week because I'll be damned if I am going to pay attention to Fox. Our cable TV choices are pretty much shit across the board these days except for Tap, Coop, and Shep That's not to say I won't pull articles from elsewhere occasionally, but those are the primaries. I like to think I have a fair amount of balance for someone who is absolutely liberal as hell
I also 100% admit probably 75% of the reason I ever watched fox news was Laurie dhue doing news updates while in college.
I've been reading Andrew Sullivan on the Atlantic for a decade. He's fantastic, and a gay conservative.