There were people that actually liked golf before Tiger. And Koepka is a solid dude. Happy to see him win and be successful. I actually admired him finishing out before Adam Scott. Huge pay putt for Scott there.
Thankfully you only watch about four tournaments a year so we don't have to listen to this fellating Tiger shit from you year round.
I don't watch any tournaments a year. I didn't watch today. And I'm not fellating anyone. I find Tiger's story fascinating and wouldn't mind seeing him rise to greatness again. Golf's ratings lately suggest that I'm not the only one.
ESPN keeps a frequently updated leaderboard with live tweets from "sports writers" on the right side of the page. In today's world, it is extremely easy to keep up with sports without watching a second of them. The only golf I watched this entire weekend was a replay of Tiger's birdie on 9, which, again, was posted on ESPN.com after it happened.
Must one physically watch something happen to understand its importance? I've never read Moby [penis], but I still understand its importance and its place in American literature.
I watched golf more before Tiger. Nothing to do with him, I was playing then until my back prevented my playing. Tiger is a shit of a man, and is on about the same level as Michael Vick with me.
Then what's your point? Lyls stated he's thankful that I only watch 4 tournaments a year, so he doesn't have to listen to me talk about Tiger very often. I pointed out that that thought process is incorrect because I don't really watch any tournaments, and here I am commenting on Tiger. You then commented on my post about Tiger bouncing back from a bogey, and your post suggested one of two things: 1. Either you were suggesting that I was lying about not watching. or 2. You were suggesting that since I didn't watch, I couldn't possibly postulate that Tiger's bouncing back on that hole could be a turning point in his career. I refuted both. My first response pointed out the ways in which I could know about him bouncing back despite not physically watching it with my eyes (by keeping up with shot by shot recap). You told me I swung and miss, so I moved on to the second option, stating that I could still understand the importance of a particular event, even if I didn't watch it. Again, you told me I swung and missed. So what am I missing, that only you and jackass seem to be noticing? Was there a 3rd option I'm unaware of? Are you about to tell me that I shouldn't be commenting on anything if I don't watch? Because if so, that will be funny.
