This is very much akin to people blaming Trump's rhetoric for things a crowd does. Just because 10% doesn't get it, doesn't mean the 90% should be deprived, or that the speaker shouldn't try to reach the 100%, even if they know the 10% won't get it.
When people are beating each other with poles, bike locks, throwing explosives into crowds, etc. it is only a matter of time before someone dies or gets seriously hurt. The fracture is already there, this will only serve to widen it. Anti-Fa should be labeled a terrorist organization.
They have like 35 million in their bank account and could have easily fought this. Why did they choose not to?
That's just a terrible answer. Men are unquestionably better athletes, in general. This is just being petty.
I'm not sure what "athletes" has to do with my post, but I suppose that's why you are named "JudgmentVol" and not "ReaderVol," or "ComprehensionVol." Your take, though is based on a narrow view of what "athlete" is, or otherwise maybe you can say what definitely makes a male diver generally better than a female diver.
Because ann counter is an idiot who only uses shock factor to keep herself relevant to people with iqs under 100 like yourself.
Depending on your metric, far is being too kind. She's an entertainer, not an innovator or trailblazer.
She's very smart. You can disagree with her world view or how she presents it. That's fine. Doesn't make her a dummy.
I don't think she is a dummy. She is not "very smart," unless "very smart" includes everyone with a six figure salary (for example).
I very much agree. The more important point is that, while smart is cute and all of that, it has nothing to do with insight, political acumen, charisma, marketability nor getting into heaven, in general. Just look at the 8th . . .
Let's put it another way: what are her original ideas? Keep in mind that I am not saying she is dumb or an idiot. She is a personality and entertainer. A flashpoint. A mascot. She is not some great thinker of the Right.
