I didn't say you made that claim. I made that claim. It is not a non sequitur because it is MY argument. An argument happens between multiple parties. When I respond to your statement, and this may be hard for you to get, sometimes it isn't always about you. If you disagree with the part that isn't about you, now we have an argument. If I then attribute something to you that doesn't follow OUR established argument, then you have a non sequitur. Hopefully this will help you in future understandings of logical fallacies, but a good first start is to understand that if an argument does not exist, there isn't one.
You and I both know that’s not what they’re fighting. There’s a lot more to it than that plus they have the right to defend themselves till due process takes it way.
Are you saying they are fighting for having a medical diagnosis as being mentally ill and retaining firearms? Or are you saying that not having a medical diagnosis is sufficent cause to remove firearms?
20,000 people, no arrests. To have the media in their hip pocket, Dems are horrible when they try to build something up.
They should move into the neighborhoods with kids getting shot every other week by stray bullets in DC. Lots of freedom there.
You'll always have these in this size crowd. Still a big difference between those and the white nationalists rally previously.
Huh. Wonder how many of those bullets were fired by guns that were registered with police, as required by law?
If only there was a way to turn off the endless stream of guns. There's just no way. Sorry, kids. Hell, [uck fay] it. Arm every 8 year old too. It is their constitutional right.
That’s a great emotional argument for innocent individuals being stripped of constitutional rights over gang and drug violence. Do you honestly think these laws will effect gang and drug violence?