I could be wrong but I always thought of the public protest as more a left thing. I feel like conservative folks tend to just shake their head and go on with their lives.
Are you saying the Trump administration lied when they said the grass coverings had never been used before, which highlighted the gaps and led to the false impression there were less people?
It's a question that makes no sense. How would two random photos of protests would not prove a rule, it'd just be two random photos. Anyone on the who gets violent is explained away as not really being on the Right. Example: ****ing yesterday when neo-nazis were smashing things and protesting, and yet have been just lumped in with "protesters," which means you see them as being all the same.
No, they were apparently saying Trump was breaking his word, but didn't elaborate. They weren't wearing swastikas to my knowledge. They didn't get much media coverage because they were one subset of ne'er-do-wells including "anarchists" (they were definitely wearing symbolage) and extreme left type weirdos. They were separate enclaves of action, mostly downtown and in chinatown. media only generally covered this stuff, and the police kept moving in and breaking them up which prevented anyone from getting a long look or interaction. I imagine youtube videos will or have popped up that would give us a better look.
Were you asleep during Glenn Beck's deal, the Tea Party protests and/or the open carry marches staged in the early days of Obama's presidency? Or have you just conveniently forgot?
I didn't say it never happened. You always take what I say (what I think I said anyway) and take it 5 steps farther.
