I know what you mean. I just think most would have responded differently if the links were to Info Wars and Western Journalism or some crap like that.
Well, I have no idea. But were I a person with political aspirations, I wouldn't let someone write a book and say some salaciously false rumor about me, without a lawsuit.
Well, it's not new. Doesn't make it true, but it has longevity. Link: http://pamelageller.com/2007/11/hillary-lesbian.html/
It's America. Each person has the right to determine which factors are most important to them when choosing the person they vote for. Saying that, a candidate also has the right to keep certain aspects of their lives private. Sure, they are running for the highest office in the land, and they chose to do that with their own free will. They also have the right to disclose as much of their personal lives they see fit. In doing so, they will live with the results of that decision, good or bad, but people don't "deserve" to know jack shit about this type thing. If bedding another woman is not illegal, I don't think it's anyone's damn business if she decides to do so. I mean, does the public have the right to know HRC's favorite sexual position or if she's a spitter or swallower if she's straight?
At on time when the news media had a semblance of ethics, newsworthy meant important or pertinent. Today it is judged by it's ability to sell papers, or garner ratings. So, if people want to hear or read about it, it's newsworthy. I'll let you decide if people want to know. Should people have a right to know? Only if it affects her ability to perform her duties.
I have a hard time seeing very many people who are already planning to vote for Hillary, all of a sudden abandon her if she said she was gay. Most of those that would care are voting for the guy who thinks god told him to be president.