POLITICS President Trump: 100+ Mornings After (Term 1 Complete)

Discussion in 'Politicants' started by IP, Apr 30, 2017.

  1. Indy

    Indy Pronoun Analyst

    I don't have to "look at it from another perspective." I can read the perspective of black Americans (which I find much more valuable than me trying to imagine what their perspective might be) who point out that the founding fathers laid the groundwork for the eventual liberation of those men they enslaved. Slavery was a global issue at the time of our country's founding. There was no "abolish it overnight" solution that could have been realistically pursued. But they laid the groundwork and planted the seed for its eventual elimination. Why would we seek to tear that down?
     
  2. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    So they were responsible for most countries eliminating slavery before their own country? How?
     
  3. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    The seed to end slavery was planted well before, and by many others, before it ever crossed our ENTIRE country's mind to do it.
     
  4. Indy

    Indy Pronoun Analyst

    Most? Which countries are you talking about?
     
  5. Ssmiff

    Ssmiff Went to the White House...Again

    He was doing his job just fine. Most of our lives were positively effected during his term until this mess.
    But hes an arrogant dickhead who wont shut his mouth and makes people hate him. When people make it personal and allow hate to override their ability to think and rationalize, and are pissed about losing, it makes the ride a lot more rough than necessary.
     
  6. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

  7. JohnnyQuickkick

    JohnnyQuickkick Calcio correspondent

    My take on it from what little reading I’ve done, most, if not all, of the big name FFs who were slave owners, knew it was wrong, knew it wouldn’t stand indefinitely, and knew they needed the southern states’ support, so weren’t brave enough to do anything about it
     
  8. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Western Europe countries.
     
  9. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    And also weren't brave enough to free their own.

    So they knew it was wrong, and continued it. On things they could do something about, ie, their own shit.
     
    cpninja likes this.
  10. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    My life was not positively effected. It was, at best, a push.

    I believe that would have been true, regardless of who was elected. Which means I could have had the same life, and not had an arrogant dickhead as the leader of my country.
     
  11. JohnnyQuickkick

    JohnnyQuickkick Calcio correspondent

    Yep.
     
  12. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Which should make you wonder whether they actually thought it was wrong.
     
  13. JohnnyQuickkick

    JohnnyQuickkick Calcio correspondent

    I think they were just afraid. It was more politically expedient to kick that can down the road. Maybe I’m naive.
     
  14. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    But let's explore that. Why was it politically expedient for them to not free their own, especially, say, at the end of their Presidential terms, when they had retired from politics?
     
  15. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    Politically - it was easier to kick can down road.

    Personally - they knew it was wrong but the desire for free labor/wealth was stronger.
     
  16. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    What term do you normally apply to someone who knows something is wrong, but does it anyway, for money?
     
  17. JohnnyQuickkick

    JohnnyQuickkick Calcio correspondent

    Human
     
    Indy likes this.
  18. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    Greed? That's probably the easiest.

    Hypocrite maybe?
     
  19. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    There’s nothing recent at all about Washington, Jefferson, Grant and Lincoln being revered. Those memorials were built in the 1800s and early 1900s. People, including conservatives, were much more patriotic then than now. Watch some Frank Capra. That’s how most people used to feel. I think that people that take the time to read the history and immerse themselves a bit in those times come out with a very positive view of them, in spite of their sins. Jefferson maybe to a lesser extent. They are flawed but certainly worthy of being celebrated.
     
  20. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Really? You hear about a guy robbing a company blindly, and you're like that guy is a greed. Or.. that guy is a hypocrite.

    Those are what you say?
     

Share This Page